Eve: everything is a record

, in Eve

A project I’m folowing with great interest is Eve. It’s based on a single unifying principle: everything is a record. Today I’d like to explore some of the implications of this idea.


Eve’s data model is based on records: a set of attribute/value pairs associated to an ID. This sounds very similar to Datomic to me. Records are stored in databases, which are records themselves. Because everything is a record, Eve only needs a handful of operations that query and manipulate records. This idea is similar to Smalltalk, where everything is an object and the universal operation is send. See LispCast’s On Type Unity for more.

Code is written in ‘blocks’, surrounded by prose. Blocks are order independent, removing a whole layer of complexity.

The fundamental operations are search, commit and bind. search pattern-matches on records in the given databases, and executes it’s block for every succesful match. commit adds new records to a database. bind does the same, but updates it’s earlier records when executed again (think React).

search @evernote
  [#note title
         tag: 'Recipes' 
         notebook: 'Web Clipper']

bind @trello
  [#card title
         list: 'Recipes'
         board: 'Inspiration']

commit @debug
         value: 'Found a new recipe: {{title}}']


In Eve, side effects are described as data. This makes it easy to swap out alternative implementations for testing or development. Because Eve is written in Javascript, all sorts of effects are accessible with minimal wiring.

While blocks seem to mutate stateful databases, making testing difficult, this doesn’t necessarily have to be the case. It seems perfectly possible to test blocks by invoking them with a set of records, and verifying the resulting set of records.

Debugging is simple because all state is transparently visible. Eve’s IDE includes a view database, for effortless visualization.

Invariants can be enforced globally, reducing duplication. Blocks can create error records, which can be handled in any way.

One thing I’m not yet certain about is the ability to define new operations. Eve focuses on a single paradigm, but how does functional programming fit into this? Function calls desugar into records, but what about function definitions? Please let me know when you have a suggestion.


For more information check out Eve’s website, blog, or documentation.